think Title II ADA in terms of attaining remedy & evidence needed elsewhere.

I believe the killing of OBL was willful murder of material witness, as his killing was not an issue of “Navy Seals” self-defense, especially in terms of their training to capture hostiles alive.

Also, I have no doubt you would have had an interest in ability to conduct independent forensics on OBL’s body.

The “burial at sea” was willful destruction of evidence intended to obstruct mass murder investigation & tort victims such as your client. OBL was officially blamed for “masterminding” 9/11, thus his body would have provided concrete evidence as to who he was.

The excuse of dumping OB’s body prior to independent forensics “to prevent fanatic reprisals” is contrary to to any execution, as I believe any “executed’ body is subject to judicially enforced independent forensics. his body would have revealed concrete clues as to who this man really was, his kidneys possible transplant, where med treatment/transplant was performed, etc. for all we know he could have had a USMC tattoo.

Obama is a member of the illinois Bar. I think willful destruction of evidence/obstruction is a bar vio? + no national security shield/defense where disabled litigants are concerned? This is a button I would push, real hard.

RE: April Gallop/child, query: is there a way to include them as plaintiffs belonging to heightened/protected class under the ADA or Rehab Act of 1973?

I do not think national security provides any legal ground to exclude any evidence sought by disabled plaintiffs alleging discrimination w/ retaliation, whether action is Article III or administrative.

The OIG has already stated abusive/improper, unaccounted sneak & peeks, exigent letters/sneak&peeks & NSLs have abundantly occurred during relevant time-frame. In terms of a civil action I envision right of claims regarding your client as existing pre-post-9/11 and even to the present.

Moreover, no doubt, state public entities, state health providers, welfare, etc., have been served w/ NSLs over the years as a means to somehow retaliate against your client? If so, an alternative state grounded remedy exists not subject to existing issue preclusion/res judicata?

GREAT interview. Beth Trutwin, you set a high standard. Your style/clarity/thoroughness is truly appreciated.

David F. Petrano, Esq (FL)

here is a hint for the brain dead: Jet fuel melts construction grade steel? What do you think Jet engines are made out of? Glass? Strawberries? Pumpernickel? Wake up your brain dead head.