Print This Post Print This Post

The Reptilian Terradactyl ShapeShifter Cheney Came to View the Kill after 9/11

[I just had to post this picture because something about it totally churned my stomach.  As a matter of fact, each time I view this picture, my stomach continues to churn.  Why is that?  Is it because it’s real?  Yeah, I believe that’s the reason.  This is a real pic. Tony]


**Steve Moran, the Person Who Took the Photo says the Following:

Steve Moran writes: “I live in New York City, and today I went to take pictures of the WTC’s wreckage.

I shot this first picture of the rescue operation, looking south on Greenwich Street. When I got home and previewed my pictures on the computer, I noticed something in the one entitled “Down Greenwich 3″ that was not in the scene when I took the photo.

Upon blowing up the questionable image (the second picture), it appeared to me to look like an angel hovering over the pile of debris and the rescuers. It couldn’t be a pigeon or a seagull because being behind the building on the right, it would be too large.

Also, we don’t have any vultures or pelicans here in NYC.

For some, the search for what happened on 9/11 isn’t over

Published 10 March, 2010

Jesse Ventura’s new book American Conspiracies questions the government’s position on 9/11. He wrote about the same topic on The Huffington Post, but his article was banned. Read it here on RT.

By Jesse Ventura

You didn’t see anything about it in the mainstream media, but two weeks ago at a conference in San Francisco, more than one thousand architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

That’s right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy because they don’t buy the government’s version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible – or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the twin towers and Building 7.

Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, put it like this: “The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction.” He’s especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 47 stories came down in “pure free-fall acceleration” that afternoon – even though it was never hit by an aircraft.

This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies, published this week by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows:

Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9/11 were going 440 and 550 miles an hour.

Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don’t claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy’s underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a “gravity driven collapse” without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately ten seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there’s the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started its investigation on August 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Steven E. Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn’t have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9/11, with Governor Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn’t mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We’re talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal, in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here’s what the paper’s lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen’s chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he’s convinced brought down the Twin Towers and the nearby Building 7:

“Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust-powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel.”

Richard Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: “Once you get to the science, it’s indisputable.”



Did you like what you read here? If so, please be kind enough to donate to support the cause (click HERE). It takes time and money to create a website like this and I love doing it so anything would be very much appreciated. And I’ll personally email you a free thank-you gift in returnmy 214 page ebook about debt, credit, bankruptcy, investing and much more!

BBS Radio. There are no equals! Get Archive Access Now

Related Articles:


Filed Under: 9/11FeaturedHeadlinesNews Articles

Tags: , , ,

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. jackpotlady says:

    Bone-chilling and stomach churning… but they have all been removed by this time haven’t they?

  2. jackpotlady says:

    P.S. I always thought in the back of my mind that not only was Cheney a nasty old lizard that he was also a nasty old shape-shifter so thanks for having the stones to put it in print! You can either print this or delete it… whatever suits your fancy! :-)))

  3. RANDY says:

    These are Royalty Draconoians & Draconians, Royalty draconians have wings, they are more powerfull than the non-winged ones [lizzies]. This is where the legends of dragons and satan come from, believe me you would not want to take on one of these in human form.

  4. RANDY says:

    The picture below is not the same beast, not even close.

  5. RANDY says:

    The picture below is a dinosaur bird, the inner earth still has donosaurs, this bird probably flew out from there, this bird is called the legendary THUNDERBIRD.

  6. Cristina says:

    Thank you !

  7. Maggie Haller says:

    Thank you….It looks like a crane to me, but I will never look at that bird w/ the same eyes. How does Mike get those aerial shots-that’s more a mystery to me…

  8. Allan says:

    Sorry, friends of pterodactyls and dragons, despite the appearance of being “behind” the building, the bird is between the building and the camera. The viewer’s depth perception is distorted by the flatness of the image. Darn that 2D!

    Computer, load this image in HoloDeck 4. Make it so that we can walk around inside the image. Ahh! I see now. A normal-sized bird closer to the camera than the picture makes it seem.

    If you insist on seeing a trailing “something” to the right side of the bird, then I’d say maybe it’s a flying pet falcon with a leash attached. It’s probably nothing — like the tail of a dragon or pteradactyl — or even anything trailing. It’s probably just another distortion in the digital perception of a regular bird, this part of it caused by light and partial overexposure.

  9. Hilarious! Honestly, I thought I was the only one who thought he had that reptilian air about him.

    I was in NY on 9-11 – guided, guarded, and protected. I am currently writing my next nonfiction work, Waiting to Live, and will be interviewing spiritual seekers and potentially some survivors throughout the process. If I may, please visit
    to leave a comment or to request an interview. This is a NON-monetized site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin