Comments on: ARRESTS!!! President Obama REVERSED INTERPOL’S IMMUNITY!! http://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/ NESARA, 2012, Channelling, & Ethereal information Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:03:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Ross Wolfhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-1523 Ross Wolf Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:49:38 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-1523 President Obama's Executive Order EO 12425 put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution, beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement. Why has Obama allowed foreign law enforcement to operate in the U.S. free of Constitutional safeguards that protected Americans, until now? Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure." That appears Key: Obama’s executive order will allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal and Civil investigations e.g.;since the Patriot Act passed, several European Countries entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the U.S. In 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of warrant-less collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government. Just prior to 9-11 Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private government contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances, intellectual property and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws. Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share in assets seized from Americans. President Obama’s Executive Order EO 12425 put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution, beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement.

Why has Obama allowed foreign law enforcement to operate in the U.S. free of Constitutional safeguards that protected Americans, until now? Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.” That appears Key: Obama’s executive order will allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal and Civil investigations e.g.;since the Patriot Act passed, several European Countries entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the U.S. In 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of warrant-less collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government.

Just prior to 9-11 Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private government contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances, intellectual property and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws.

Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share in assets seized from Americans.

]]> By: Bethhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-602 Beth Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:50:18 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-602 Begin with KOS, Soltec, Korton. There are millions of Galactic Militia in the International Criminal Police Organization, FBI, Secret Service, and others. They are all adepts. The are all Galactic Humans. These are the ones working together with others, such as the Hong Kong Blonds and Lady Master Nada with her workers in the justice system and the Solar Tribunal. All of these are working with Universal Jurisdiction and these new rules to finish arrests. Now they can arrest those in the District of Columbia. Tomorrow morning? Could be. Now look at the ICC. A States Party must prosecute any arrest if the other Country unwilling or unable. If the United States soldier is arrested for War Crimes in Afghanistan, since they are a States Party, they may take the case to the ICC. The arrests are based on where the crime happened, not the individual's home country. When Hillary said it was too bad we hadn't ratified, she was double speaking. She forgot to mention, the UK is a member (for example). A States Party has ratified the Rome Statute. These States Parties must cooperate with the ICC in the arrests. There are 110 of these. Another 38 Countries are signatories, but have not ratified the Rome Statute. These are: As of October 2009, 38 countries have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute: In Europe: Armenia, Moldova, Monaco, Russia and Ukraine In Africa: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Morocco, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Sudan and Zimbabwe. In the Americas: Bahamas, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia and the United States. In Asia: Bahrain, Bangladesh, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Syria, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen. States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court The states parties to the ICC (as of 1 October 2009) The States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court are those countries that have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the International Criminal Court. As of October 2009, 110 states are members of the Court. A further 38 states have signed but not ratified the treaty, and several states that have not signed the treaty have indicated their intention to accede to it. The Court can automatically exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State Party or by a national of a State Party. States Parties must co-operate with the Court, including surrendering suspects when requested to do so by the Court. States Parties are entitled to participate and vote in proceedings of the Assembly of States Parties, which is the Court's governing body. Total number of States Parties, 1999-2006 As of October 2009, the following 110 countries have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute: In Europe: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom In Africa: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Comoros, Djibouti, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia. In the Americas: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela In Asia: Afghanistan, Cambodia, Cook Islands, Japan, Jordan, Mongolia, South Korea, Tajikistan In Oceania: Australia, East Timor, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Samoa Withdrawal Several African countries, including Senegal, Djibouti and Comoros, have called on African ICC members to withdraw en masse from the court in protest at allegations that the court targets Africa and specifically the indictment of Sudanese President, Omar al-Bashir. Implementing legislation The Rome Statute obliges States Parties to cooperate with the court in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, including the arrest and surrender of suspects.Part 9 of the Statute requires all States Parties to “ensure that there are procedures available under their national law for all of the forms of cooperation which are specified under this Part”. Under the Rome Statute's complementarity principle, the court only has jurisdiction over cases where the relevant State is unwilling or unable to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the case itself. Therefore many States Parties have implemented national legislation to provide for the investigation and prosecution of crimes that fall under the jurisdiction of the court. Begin with KOS, Soltec, Korton. There are millions of Galactic Militia in the International Criminal Police Organization, FBI, Secret Service, and others. They are all adepts. The are all Galactic Humans. These are the ones working together with others, such as the Hong Kong Blonds and Lady Master Nada with her workers in the justice system and the Solar Tribunal. All of these are working with Universal Jurisdiction and these new rules to finish arrests. Now they can arrest those in the District of Columbia. Tomorrow morning? Could be.
Now look at the ICC.
A States Party must prosecute any arrest if the other Country unwilling or unable. If the United States soldier is arrested for War Crimes in Afghanistan, since they are a States Party, they may take the case to the ICC. The arrests are based on where the crime happened, not the individual’s home country. When Hillary said it was too bad we hadn’t ratified, she was double speaking. She forgot to mention, the UK is a member (for example).
A States Party has ratified the Rome Statute. These States Parties must cooperate with the ICC in the arrests. There are 110 of these. Another 38 Countries are signatories, but have not ratified the Rome Statute.
These are:
As of October 2009, 38 countries have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute:
In Europe: Armenia, Moldova, Monaco, Russia and Ukraine
In Africa: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Morocco, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Sudan and Zimbabwe.
In the Americas: Bahamas, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia and the United States.
In Asia: Bahrain, Bangladesh, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Syria, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
The states parties to the ICC (as of 1 October 2009)
The States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court are those countries that have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the International Criminal Court. As of October 2009, 110 states are members of the Court. A further 38 states have signed but not ratified the treaty, and several states that have not signed the treaty have indicated their intention to accede to it.
The Court can automatically exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State Party or by a national of a State Party. States Parties must co-operate with the Court, including surrendering suspects when requested to do so by the Court.
States Parties are entitled to participate and vote in proceedings of the Assembly of States Parties, which is the Court’s governing body.
Total number of States Parties, 1999-2006
As of October 2009, the following 110 countries have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute:
In Europe: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom
In Africa: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Comoros, Djibouti, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia.
In the Americas: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela
In Asia: Afghanistan, Cambodia, Cook Islands, Japan, Jordan, Mongolia, South Korea, Tajikistan
In Oceania: Australia, East Timor, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Samoa
Withdrawal
Several African countries, including Senegal, Djibouti and Comoros, have called on African ICC members to withdraw en masse from the court in protest at allegations that the court targets Africa and specifically the indictment of Sudanese President, Omar al-Bashir.
Implementing legislation
The Rome Statute obliges States Parties to cooperate with the court in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, including the arrest and surrender of suspects.Part 9 of the Statute requires all States Parties to “ensure that there are procedures available under their national law for all of the forms of cooperation which are specified under this Part”.
Under the Rome Statute’s complementarity principle, the court only has jurisdiction over cases where the relevant State is unwilling or unable to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the case itself. Therefore many States Parties have implemented national legislation to provide for the investigation and prosecution of crimes that fall under the jurisdiction of the court.

]]> By: Johnhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-599 John Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:15:11 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-599 Steve Schippert's editorial 12/23/09: "Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries... "Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — ... "Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?..." http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGY3MTI4YTRjZmYwMGU1ZjZhOGJmNmQ0NmJiZDNmMDY= Perhaps the point here is that Intepol can now arrest people in usa now, as an agent of the ICC? This above would support the 'arrests' idea. What do you think? Steve Schippert’s editorial 12/23/09:

“Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries…

“Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — …

“Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?…”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGY3MTI4YTRjZmYwMGU1ZjZhOGJmNmQ0NmJiZDNmMDY=

Perhaps the point here is that Intepol can now arrest people in usa now, as an agent of the ICC? This above would support the ‘arrests’ idea.

What do you think?

]]> By: adminhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-597 admin Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:34:46 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-597 This is the luxury of legalese and double speak. I am interpreting it differently. I guess everyone has an opinion and we're all really only going to know when disclosure and the whole thing comes down. I, along with tons of others, are hoping for that soon. This is the luxury of legalese and double speak. I am interpreting it differently. I guess everyone has an opinion and we’re all really only going to know when disclosure and the whole thing comes down. I, along with tons of others, are hoping for that soon.

]]> By: HPShttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-581 HPS Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:09:37 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-581 I'm not reading things the way you are. At least I think I'm not. Reagan excluded those paragraphs. Meaning, those paragraphs were ALREADY out. Obama didn't take them out. He put them back in: Reagan said: "(intl orgs are) entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; EXCEPT THOSE (cushy tax free provisions)provided by . . ." Reagan signed that EO because he wanted Interpol to pay taxes to the IRS. By Obama removing the exclusion those cushy tax free paragraphs are now back IN and Interpol agents no longer need to pay taxes. So basically this EO is telling me that, as of this week, any international organization can operate in the US without having to pay taxes on anything. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal, but I don't know how it relates to arrests. Was arresting criminals on US soil before this week too expensive due to the income/duty taxes the Interpol agents were paying to the IRS? Or something? I’m not reading things the way you are. At least I think I’m not. Reagan excluded those paragraphs. Meaning, those paragraphs were ALREADY out. Obama didn’t take them out. He put them back in:

Reagan said: “(intl orgs are) entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; EXCEPT THOSE (cushy tax free provisions)provided by . . .”

Reagan signed that EO because he wanted Interpol to pay taxes to the IRS. By Obama removing the exclusion those cushy tax free paragraphs are now back IN and Interpol agents no longer need to pay taxes.

So basically this EO is telling me that, as of this week, any international organization can operate in the US without having to pay taxes on anything. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal, but I don’t know how it relates to arrests. Was arresting criminals on US soil before this week too expensive due to the income/duty taxes the Interpol agents were paying to the IRS? Or something?

]]> By: adminhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-564 admin Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:08:50 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-564 Lynn, Thank you and you're welcome. It feels good when I make something very tough to read, very easy to read. Much love, Tony. Lynn,

Thank you and you’re welcome. It feels good when I make something very tough to read, very easy to read.

Much love, Tony.

]]> By: Lynn Whttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-563 Lynn W Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:06:46 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-563 Incredible. Thanks Tony for taking the time to put this together, the effort is commendable. Perhaps Christopher Story is right! He reported arrests have been taking place. Incredible. Thanks Tony for taking the time to put this together, the effort is commendable.

Perhaps Christopher Story is right!

He reported arrests have been taking place.

]]> By: adminhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-561 admin Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:03:25 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-561 Brad, you have legitimate points. Don't think that these arrests are going to not affect the Dems. Man, they're gonna get it too. I've heard that there are only about 60 of the 400+ that are NOT going to get arrested. That's a lot of dem der Dems, too. ;) Brad, you have legitimate points. Don’t think that these arrests are going to not affect the Dems. Man, they’re gonna get it too. I’ve heard that there are only about 60 of the 400+ that are NOT going to get arrested.

That’s a lot of dem der Dems, too. ;)

]]> By: adminhttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-535 admin Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:57:11 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-535 I was pretty darn stoked to write this up. It took awhile, but it felt great when it was done. Glad I could share! LL, Tony. I was pretty darn stoked to write this up. It took awhile, but it felt great when it was done.

Glad I could share! LL, Tony.

]]> By: Gretchen Whipplehttp://www.welcomethelight.com/2009/12/arrests-president-obama-reversed-interpols-immunity/#comment-534 Gretchen Whipple Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:50:30 +0000 http://www.welcomethelight.com/?p=5052#comment-534 Tony, In my view, this is a hugely significent peice of reporting. The implications of this information is truly stunning. Thank you so much for bringing this forward to our collective awareness. you are awesome! Gretchen Tony,
In my view, this is a hugely significent peice of reporting. The implications of this information is truly stunning. Thank you so much for bringing this forward to our collective awareness. you are awesome!
Gretchen

]]>