Print This Post Print This Post

ARRESTS!!! President Obama REVERSED INTERPOL’S IMMUNITY!!

obamaeopic

December 16, 2009

Obama reversed Interpol’s Immunity Law!! This now allows them everything they need to search and seize for International Court in the Hague.  They can seize money, stocks, bonds, property (that’s a wide open one), computers, cell phones – even property in their house, their employees houses, their servants, their family – and the list goes on.

Love the dark hats even more as they head out.

The arrests have continued unhindered out of the public eye. Do you think it was an accident that all of the planes were grounded today and they closed the government offices (HERE)?

Thank you President Obama for leading us into World Peace.  Tony

————————————————————————–

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release                                              December 17, 2009

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
– – – – – – –
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 16, 2009.

OBAMA’S EO 12425 AMENDMENT CAN BE FOUND HERE.

(If you wish to view the original United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, you can view the PDF by clicking HERE.)

This amendment change mentioned above is the amending to EO 12425 that Ronald Reagan had signed on June 16, 1983:

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; except those provided by Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.

Signature of Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
The White House,
June 16, 1983.

REAGAN’S EO 12425 AMENDMENT CAN BE FOUND HERE.

NOTE: Just to put all the changes to EO 12425, Bill Clinton made one other small change September 15, 1995:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities upon the International Criminal Police Organization (‘‘INTERPOL’’) it is hereby ordered that Executive Order No. 12425 be amended by deleting, in the first sentence, the words ‘‘the portions of Section 2(d) and’’ and the words ‘‘relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes’’.

Signature of William J. Clinton
William J. Clinton
The White House,
September 15, 1995.

CLINTON’S EO 12425 AMENDMENT CAN BE FOUND HERE.

Here are the actual sections of the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 that Obama removed on the 16th:

Section 2(c).
Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and bywhomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable. [Those of us who have studied “legalese” and definitions, property can mean MANY things – pretty much everything they own.  Tony]

Section 3.
Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Commissioner of Customs withthe approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the baggage and effects of alien officers and employees of international organizations, or of aliens designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to such organizations, or of the families, suites, ands ervants of such officers, employees, or representatives shall be admitted (when imported inconnexion with the arrival of the owner) free of customs duties and free of internal-revenue taxes imposed upon or by reason of importation. [Nice.  No duty charges or IRS concerns. Tony]

Section 4.
The Internal Revenue Code is hereby amended as follows:

(a) Effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1943, section116 (c), relating to the exclusion from gross income of income of foreign governments, is amended to read as follows:

“(c) Income of Foreign Governments and of International Organizations. The income of foreign governments or international organizations received from investments in the United States in stocks, bonds, or other domestic securities owned by such foreign governments or by international organizations, or from interest on deposits in banks in the United States of moneys belonging to such foreign governments or international organizations, or from any other source within the United States.”

(b) Effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1943, section116 (h) (1), relating to the exclusion from gross income of amounts paid employees of foreign governments, is amended to read as follows:

“(1) Rule for Exclusion. – Wages, fees, or salary of any employee of a foreign government or of an international organization or of the Commonwealth of the Philippines (including a consular or other officer, or a non-diplomatic representative), received as compensation for official services to such government, international organization, or such Commonwealth –

“(A) If such employee is not a citizen of the United States, or is a citizen of the Commonwealth of the Philippines (whether or not a citizen of the United States); and
“(B) If, in the case of an employee of a foreign government or of the Commonwealth of the Philippines, the services are of a character similar to those performed by employees of the Government of the United States in foreign countries or in the Commonwealth of the Philippines, as the case may be; and
“(C) If, in the case of an employee of a foreign government or the Commonwealth of the Philippines, the foreign government or the Commonwealth grants an equivalent exemption to employees of the Government of the United States performing similar services in such foreign country or such Commonwealth, as the case may be.”

(c) Effective January 1, 1946, section 1426 (b), defining the term “employment” for the purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, is amended (1) by striking out the word “or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15) and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) by inserting at the end ofthe subsection the following new paragraph:

“(16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization.”

(d) Effective January 1, 1946, section 1607 (c), defining the term “employment” for thepurposes of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, is amended (1) by striking out the word”or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15)and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) by inserting at the end ofthe subsection the for owing new paragraph:

“(16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization.”

(e) Section 1621 (a) (5), relating to the definition of “wages” for the purpose of collection of income tax at the source, is amended by inserting after the words, “foreign government” the words “or an international organization”.

(f) Section 3466 (a), relating to exemption from communications taxes is amended byinserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” a comma and the words “oran international organization”.

(g) Section 3469 (f) (1), relating to exemption from the tax on transportation of persons, is amended by inserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” acomma and the words “or an international organization”.

(h) Section 3475 (b) (1), relating to exemption from the tax on transportation of property, is amended by inserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” acomma and the words “or an international organization”.

(i) Section 3797 (a), relating to definitions, is amended by adding at the end there of a new paragraph as follows:

(18) International Organization. – The term ‘international organization’ means a public international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act.” [Sounds like all the alphabet agencies. Tony]

Section 5.
(a) Effective January 1, 1946, section 209 (b) of the Social Security Act, defining the term “employment” for the purposes of title II of the Acts is amended (1) bystriking out the word “or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15) and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) byinserting at the end of the subsection the following new paragraph:

“(16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under theInternational Organizations Immunities Act.”

(b) No tax shall be collected under title VIII or IX of the Social Security Act or under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act or the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, with respect to services rendered prior to January 1, 1946, which are described in paragraph (16) of sections 1426 (b) and 1607 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and any such tax heretofore collected (including penalty and interest with respect thereto, if any) shall be refunded in accordance with the provisions of law applicable in the case of erroneous or illegal collection of the tax. No interest shall be allowed or paid on the amount of any such refund. No payment shall be made under title II of the Social Security Act with respect to services rendered prior to January 1, 1946, which are described in paragraph (16) of section209 (b) of such Act, as amended.

Section 6.
International organizations shall be exempt from all property taxes imposed by, or under the authority of any Act of Congress, including such Acts as are applicable solely to the District of Columbia or the Territories.

To end this off, if you’re a little bit curious (and made it this far down), check this out…

Public International Organizations Entitled To Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities

International organizations were designated by executive order as public international organizations entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act (this subchapter) as follows:

TOO MANY TO LIST.  CLICK HERE – YOU’LL RECOGNIZE A LOT OF THEM.

——————————————–

Did you like what you read here? If so, please be kind enough to donate to support the cause (click HERE). It takes time and money to create a website like this and I love doing it so anything would be very much appreciated. And I’ll personally email you a free thank-you gift in returnmy 214 page ebook about debt, credit, bankruptcy, investing and much more!

BBS Radio. There are no equals! Get Archive Access Now

Related Articles:

Share

Filed Under: ArrestsFeaturedHeadlinesNews ArticlesUnited StatesWorldwide

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Brad says:

    I can only find arrests of Republicans here. Surely we’re not supposed to believe that the Democrats are squeaky clean…..or are we? You can insert “democrat arrested” into any search engine and find all manner of arrests made recently. I didn’t come to this site to read political idealism but it surely is what I have found. That’s sad. How can you expect to have any credibility? Unless….God is a democrat?

    • admin says:

      Brad, you have legitimate points. Don’t think that these arrests are going to not affect the Dems. Man, they’re gonna get it too. I’ve heard that there are only about 60 of the 400+ that are NOT going to get arrested.

      That’s a lot of dem der Dems, too. 😉

  2. Gretchen Whipple says:

    Tony,
    In my view, this is a hugely significent peice of reporting. The implications of this information is truly stunning. Thank you so much for bringing this forward to our collective awareness. you are awesome!
    Gretchen

  3. Lynn W says:

    Incredible. Thanks Tony for taking the time to put this together, the effort is commendable.

    Perhaps Christopher Story is right!

    He reported arrests have been taking place.

  4. HPS says:

    I’m not reading things the way you are. At least I think I’m not. Reagan excluded those paragraphs. Meaning, those paragraphs were ALREADY out. Obama didn’t take them out. He put them back in:

    Reagan said: “(intl orgs are) entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; EXCEPT THOSE (cushy tax free provisions)provided by . . .”

    Reagan signed that EO because he wanted Interpol to pay taxes to the IRS. By Obama removing the exclusion those cushy tax free paragraphs are now back IN and Interpol agents no longer need to pay taxes.

    So basically this EO is telling me that, as of this week, any international organization can operate in the US without having to pay taxes on anything. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal, but I don’t know how it relates to arrests. Was arresting criminals on US soil before this week too expensive due to the income/duty taxes the Interpol agents were paying to the IRS? Or something?

    • admin says:

      This is the luxury of legalese and double speak. I am interpreting it differently. I guess everyone has an opinion and we’re all really only going to know when disclosure and the whole thing comes down. I, along with tons of others, are hoping for that soon.

  5. John says:

    Steve Schippert’s editorial 12/23/09:

    “Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries…

    “Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — …

    “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?…”

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGY3MTI4YTRjZmYwMGU1ZjZhOGJmNmQ0NmJiZDNmMDY=

    Perhaps the point here is that Intepol can now arrest people in usa now, as an agent of the ICC? This above would support the ‘arrests’ idea.

    What do you think?

  6. Beth says:

    Begin with KOS, Soltec, Korton. There are millions of Galactic Militia in the International Criminal Police Organization, FBI, Secret Service, and others. They are all adepts. The are all Galactic Humans. These are the ones working together with others, such as the Hong Kong Blonds and Lady Master Nada with her workers in the justice system and the Solar Tribunal. All of these are working with Universal Jurisdiction and these new rules to finish arrests. Now they can arrest those in the District of Columbia. Tomorrow morning? Could be.
    Now look at the ICC.
    A States Party must prosecute any arrest if the other Country unwilling or unable. If the United States soldier is arrested for War Crimes in Afghanistan, since they are a States Party, they may take the case to the ICC. The arrests are based on where the crime happened, not the individual’s home country. When Hillary said it was too bad we hadn’t ratified, she was double speaking. She forgot to mention, the UK is a member (for example).
    A States Party has ratified the Rome Statute. These States Parties must cooperate with the ICC in the arrests. There are 110 of these. Another 38 Countries are signatories, but have not ratified the Rome Statute.
    These are:
    As of October 2009, 38 countries have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute:
    In Europe: Armenia, Moldova, Monaco, Russia and Ukraine
    In Africa: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Morocco, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Sudan and Zimbabwe.
    In the Americas: Bahamas, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia and the United States.
    In Asia: Bahrain, Bangladesh, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Syria, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
    States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
    The states parties to the ICC (as of 1 October 2009)
    The States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court are those countries that have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the International Criminal Court. As of October 2009, 110 states are members of the Court. A further 38 states have signed but not ratified the treaty, and several states that have not signed the treaty have indicated their intention to accede to it.
    The Court can automatically exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State Party or by a national of a State Party. States Parties must co-operate with the Court, including surrendering suspects when requested to do so by the Court.
    States Parties are entitled to participate and vote in proceedings of the Assembly of States Parties, which is the Court’s governing body.
    Total number of States Parties, 1999-2006
    As of October 2009, the following 110 countries have ratified or acceded to the Rome Statute:
    In Europe: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom
    In Africa: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Comoros, Djibouti, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia.
    In the Americas: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela
    In Asia: Afghanistan, Cambodia, Cook Islands, Japan, Jordan, Mongolia, South Korea, Tajikistan
    In Oceania: Australia, East Timor, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Samoa
    Withdrawal
    Several African countries, including Senegal, Djibouti and Comoros, have called on African ICC members to withdraw en masse from the court in protest at allegations that the court targets Africa and specifically the indictment of Sudanese President, Omar al-Bashir.
    Implementing legislation
    The Rome Statute obliges States Parties to cooperate with the court in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, including the arrest and surrender of suspects.Part 9 of the Statute requires all States Parties to “ensure that there are procedures available under their national law for all of the forms of cooperation which are specified under this Part”.
    Under the Rome Statute’s complementarity principle, the court only has jurisdiction over cases where the relevant State is unwilling or unable to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the case itself. Therefore many States Parties have implemented national legislation to provide for the investigation and prosecution of crimes that fall under the jurisdiction of the court.

  7. Ross Wolf says:

    President Obama’s Executive Order EO 12425 put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution, beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement.

    Why has Obama allowed foreign law enforcement to operate in the U.S. free of Constitutional safeguards that protected Americans, until now? Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.” That appears Key: Obama’s executive order will allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal and Civil investigations e.g.;since the Patriot Act passed, several European Countries entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the U.S. In 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of warrant-less collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government.

    Just prior to 9-11 Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private government contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances, intellectual property and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws.

    Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share in assets seized from Americans.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin